🔗 Share this article

This action from the Democratic National Committee to withhold the release regarding its own post-election analysis on the last presidential race seems remarkable but entirely predictable. Resistant to frank assessments, the Democrats' governing body often functions more like a PR firm rather than a political organization devoted to cultivating a volunteer base capable of prevailing at the polls.

A Culture Resistant to Internal Critique

Hesitant to break with the party establishment's culture demanding unity, the committee has continued under that legacy throughout this past year. Making public such a report might have shown whether party leaders are interested to encourage public discourse regarding the missteps which allowed Donald Trump to become president again. Yet, the leadership is moving forward under the pretense that there's nothing to glean following the stunning loss of 2024.

Our guiding principle: will this lead to victory? If not, it becomes a sideline issue from the core mission," a justification that has been offered for withholding the report.

Key Issues a Report Could Have Addressed

Any valuable post-mortem with any value would not dodge certain uncomfortable matters. This encompasses:

• Electoral Alienation: Failing to retain among a significant portion of the electorate who voted for the Democratic ticket in 2020 was decisive in the close recent race.
• The Decision to Run: The determined insistence by a party leader to stay in the race, coupled with a very late exit, is viewed as robbing Democratic voters of open primaries.
• Losing Touch With the Working-Class Base: While facing inflation, the electoral effort allegedly accommodating corporate donors' interests without successfully attempting to address the role of big business.
• The Foreign Policy Impact: The failure to adjust an approach on the situation in Gaza is cited as losing significant blocs, notably among young people, Arab American communities, Muslim voters.
• Eroding Youth Support: Polling data demonstrates a huge drop-off of Democratic support among voters aged 18-29.

A Pattern Shunning Scrutiny

This refusal is consistent with a longstanding habit to avoid difficult realities. This mirrors a dynamic where nearly all elected Democrat in Congress went along with an incumbent's insistence on seeking another term right up until a disastrous public debate performance led to a reversal.

Concurrently, a significant majority of Democratic voters had been consistently telling surveyors that they opposed the incumbent to run again.

Financial Questions

An honest autopsy would also investigate matters about financial allocations, such as how much money flowed to insider consultants and advertising contractors over the course of an electoral effort that burned through a staggering sum over a few months.

The Underlying Problem

Fundamentally, the blockage of the official autopsy points to a submission to the established hierarchy that oversaw a losing presidential campaign. The message for ordinary supporters – including millions of loyal volunteers – is that they do not have a right to understand the lessons party chiefs say they discovered from hundreds of interviews drawing from feedback from all states.

A political entity unwilling to honestly assess where it went wrong will struggle to climb out of the rut that ended up being so helpful to the rival party.